STAR WARS ALLEGIANCE CLASS FREE

I only talked about the main guns of the battleships I used for reference, so at 50 times the number of the heaviest armament I believe should also translate to secondaries and tertiaries. Given how much space is taken up by the main guns of WWII battleships, the 60 Ion cannons, hell maybe even 150, can probably still fit. I say 50x rather than directly translating the 150x because the Quad Heavies take up around three times the deck space of a Mark 7 or Type 94.Д¬onsidering the three primary weapons on Iowa and Yamato class battleships, and the numerous emplacements of secondary and tertiary weaponry found on those ships, I would hope to see at least 150 HEAVY turbolaser batteries. ThereвЂ™s just so much empty space on the hull of she ship that just isnвЂ™t used. So at around 150 times the deck space, I would hope that they have around 50 times the number of primary weapons.

STAR WARS ALLEGIANCE CLASS FREE

This does not include the ventral deck space that understandably goes unused in maritime vessels, but is entirely free real estate for space vessels. The ISD has around 75 times the dorsal deck space (the ISD is a triangle, so half the area of the dimensions, but also since a battleship is somewhat of a rounded diamond, I brought that ratio to somewhere between 1/2 (triangle vs rectangle) and pi/4 (ellipse vs rectangle)). 60 is the TOTAL number of Turbolaser emplacements, not just the heavy ones, so there are far less than 60 of those quad heavies, and in the case of the octuple barbettes, a measly 8. I just feel that a ship that is almost six times as long and five times as tall as an Iowa Class, and almost 15.5 times as wide as a Yamato-class, should have far more than just 60 turbolaser batteries.ДЄssuming all batteries are 50x50x50m, (the whole thing, not just the turret cap) which is around the size of a Quad Heavy Turbolaser Battery, and a bit smaller than an octuple barbette, they should be able to fit far more than just 60 on a ship thatвЂ™s around 600 times the size of a Yamato. I love star destroyers, but I always felt the utilization of space was really bad. But thatвЂ™s only using the ISD as a reference, and my argument is that the ISD itself is an extremely unreliable as a reference in terms of believability. ItвЂ™s not MORE than an Executor, but I get your frustration with how similar the numbers are.ДЇrom an in-universe perspective, itвЂ™s a big leap from the norms of ship armament, so I agree with you there that itвЂ™s kind of unbelievable that a ship around 5 times the surface area of the ISD can have over 25 times the firepower in numbers alone.

Also, Executor has 2k turbos, 2k heavy turbos, and 250 ions.

TL DR: I actually personally believe the Resurgent is MORE believable than the ISD itself, and by extension the Executor and Allegiance. ItвЂ™s against SW starship design philosophy overall from an IN-UNIVERSE perspective. Also, my argument is not against Ansel, who I believe is an absolute phenom when it comes to designing ships using SW design philosophies. This is only my opinion, and it doesnвЂ™t take into account things like power-generation and other necessary ship functions in-universe, so donвЂ™t expect anything on the level of an article fit for the journal, Science.

Star wars allegiance class